After posting the C20 Chairman's Letter yesterday, another con paper from the Council 54 Vice Chairman, Art Aaron popped up.  It is well worth a read.  While there is a bit less TA analysis than Tom Tucker's letter, there is some real insight into the process that brought this TA and possibilities if the TA is rejected.  Here's Art's letter. 

If you found these two letters to be enlighting and informative, pass them on to others.  They are difficult to find and download from the ALPA website.  Links from Google Docs make them easy to read and pass on.  Here they both are in one easy location:

DAL 20 Chairman's Letter.

DAL 54 Vice Chairman's TA Evaluation.

The DALPA TA Pro and Con

The DALPA TA Pro and Con

We deserve to hear both sides of this TA, both good and bad.  If you read what is put out by the Delta MEC you will come to the conclusion they want this TA to pass and doing justice to the downsides of this agreement are not part of that plan.  From all I have read, the best summary of the TA including both sides of the major changes has come from Tom Tucker, the Chairman of Council 20.  In his letter he summarizes the changes, discusses the impact of the changes, then offers his opinion and grade on the most relevant sections.  Here is a link to his letter uploaded to google docs. 

A couple of things stood out in Tom's letter.

• The DALPA Contract Survey results "rated pay as the number one priority."  "The difference between the pilot's number number 1 and number 2 priorities was ... greater than 50%."
• "The resulting pay raise is less than the direction given by the MEC."
• "... future industry pay rates will be based on bankruptcy contracts and future marginal increases."
• "... a sense of emergency did not exist and self imposed (potentially false) deadlines followed."
• "... the member ratification time frame was reduced and ... {has} more time to negotiate if the TA is rejected."
• "The TA did not satisfy the guidance and parameters as communicated by line pilots and the MEC."

If you are a leaning yes, no or are uncertain about how you will vote please read Tom's letter.  It will provide more information and probably raise more questions you will want answered.

The TA

Shock.  Disbelief.  We were told the rumors were false (4-8-3-3).  In typical ALPA fashion, they deny something pretty close to right on, one only need add a zero-point-five to make it true.  This symbol my gut reaction to the TA.  I started reading and talking to others.  Now I can add that I have real concerns about Scope and a few other things.  Serious questions arise.  Seek out answers.  Speak to others.  Go beyond just reading ALPA's message, they are admittedly selling this TA.  Stay tuned for more.